written in the past about problems with the courts. That was about a court order having the wrong court details. In the past few weeks I have had, not only a further instance of the court / order mixup, but two very serious errors in the text of orders sent out to me.
One, which was an order relating to an Employment Tribunal award, actually gave us, the solicitors, as the defendants and not the real defendants! God knows what training the clerk who did it was given. To do them justice the court amended it pretty swiftly once we had pointed out the error (I wrote them a stern letter). Hopefully it will not affect our credit rating.
The other mistake was saying in an order for possession that the order was made under discretionary grounds when it had actually been made under mandatory grounds. A copy of Counsels’ endorsed backsheet soon sorted that out, but it just goes to show that you have to be really careful.
I have
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Cool Followers
Popular entries
-
Public limited companies in Norway were given until the start of this year to implement rules designed to increase the representation of wom...
-
Like many people I suspect, I was concerned to read the recent BBC report about glass ceilings which, the report said, means that "to...
-
In Gregson v HAE Trustees Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 1006 (Ch) a so-called "dog-leg" claim was brought against the directors of a ...
-
As some of you will know, today I was speaking at the CLT 12th Annual Residential Landlord & Tenant Update . The great thing about spea...
-
The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta released a very interesting order today, considering whether the right to freedom of exp...
-
The Securities and Exchange Commission has voted unanimously to introduce amendments designed to strengthen the regulatory framework govern...
-
Figures from the DCA show that landlord possession claims were 20% down during the last quarter. Co-incidentally this was the first quarter...
-
The Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner is investigating after old medical records were found in a dumpster behind a coffee shop by...
-
Today, April 6, is an important date for aficionados of the Companies Act 2006 and anyone else interested in the Government's programme...
-
Earlier this year, in Hawkes v Cuddy [2009] EWCA Civ 261 , the Court of Appeal declined to follow the position, adopted in Re Guidezone [2...
Comments
Post a comment on: More problems at the county court