Of course it is even more frustrating if you think that the tenant may actually have gone. But if the keys have not been returned and at least some of the tenants possessions are still in the property, you cannot count on this. If the landlord goes in and changes the locks when the tenant has not really left, then not only is he liable for prosecution, but also the tenant can sue him for unlawful eviction. And claim compensation. A nice way to wipe out those rent arrears.
I mention all this because I was discussing this very problem with one of my clients this morning. Sadly (for him that is) the keys have not been returned and the tenants still have clothes and other stuff inside. We decided that it was really too risky for him to even consider going in, so I have now drafted up the paperwork for the court claim and we will be issuing shortly. But its such a waste if the tenant really has gone after all. Not only of my clients time and money, a property left vacant when someone else could be living there (he has tenants waiting to go in), but also a waste of court time which could probably be better used for something else.
The Law Commission have been reviewing housing law generally, and I understand that it is planned to bring in a new procedure to cover cases of abandonment, similar to that currently used in Scotland. But the promised reforms are taking a long time (the Law Commission were due to bring out a final report and draft bill last summer) and in the meantime landlords are faced with a choice between bringing time consuming court proceedings or risk being sued for unlawful eviction.
Still, looking on the bright side, its all more work for me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Cool Followers
Popular entries
-
Public limited companies in Norway were given until the start of this year to implement rules designed to increase the representation of wom...
-
Figures from the DCA show that landlord possession claims were 20% down during the last quarter. Co-incidentally this was the first quarter...
-
As some of you will know, today I was speaking at the CLT 12th Annual Residential Landlord & Tenant Update . The great thing about spea...
-
The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta released a very interesting order today, considering whether the right to freedom of exp...
-
The Securities and Exchange Commission has voted unanimously to introduce amendments designed to strengthen the regulatory framework govern...
-
Like many people I suspect, I was concerned to read the recent BBC report about glass ceilings which, the report said, means that "to...
-
The Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner is investigating after old medical records were found in a dumpster behind a coffee shop by...
-
In Gregson v HAE Trustees Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 1006 (Ch) a so-called "dog-leg" claim was brought against the directors of a ...
-
Note - the Landlord Law Blog has now moved to www.landlordlawblog.co.uk . There is still quite a bit of confusion regarding the recent deci...
-
Earlier this year, in Hawkes v Cuddy [2009] EWCA Civ 261 , the Court of Appeal declined to follow the position, adopted in Re Guidezone [2...
Comments
Post a comment on: The Abandonment problem