On April 28, Australia's Corporate Law Minister, Nick Sherry, delivered a speech at Riskmetric Group's Australia governance conference. The following comments of the Minister are of particular interest:
"I have previously announced that the Australian Government is examining three areas of corporate governance. The three areas are corporate offences… sanctions… and personal liability for directors. Our reforms in these areas will have one common goal — to ensure that we have a consistent and principled approach to addressing misconduct in corporate law. The particular measures to be taken include, firstly, clarifying the standards required of directors. This will enable them to make decisions with confidence. Decisions that are in the best interests of shareholders in fast-moving and complex business situations. Secondly, where directors fail to meet these standards, the law will ensure that the sanctions imposed are credible… flexible… and transparent. Thirdly, I believe that it is important to look at the emerging trend for imposing personal liability on directors for corporate fault. While this may be appropriate in exceptional cases, it now appears to be the norm. As a first step, Treasury will soon survey about 600 leading company directors to establish what is happening in the boardrooms of our leading companies. For corporate law this is where the rubber meets the road! In assessing the case for corporate law reform, we need to focus on what’s happening in the boardroom, as well as what’s happening in the court room".
With regard to financial reporting, the Minister stated:
"Earlier this year, I asked Treasury to examine a range of reforms to improve the relevance of financial reports to investors and the broader community. This work includes developing proposals to strengthen the executive remuneration framework. The proposals will be designed to promote greater transparency, accountability and shareholder engagement. While it’s important to get these reforms right, we certainly don’t intend to dictate the level of directors’ salaries. The Government believes that boards are best placed to set remuneration levels within companies, and take responsibility for those remuneration levels to shareholders."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Cool Followers
Popular entries
-
Incident: Sick Kids physician loses portable hard-drive with unencrypted personal health informationA physician from Sick Kids hospital who decided to travel with a portable hard-drive containing unencrypted health information on 3,300 pat...
-
The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta released a very interesting order today, considering whether the right to freedom of exp...
-
The Securities and Exchange Commission has voted unanimously to introduce amendments designed to strengthen the regulatory framework govern...
-
USA: Restoring American Financial Stability - discussion draft published by Senate Banking CommitteeThe United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs has published a discussion draft titled Restoring American Financ...
-
In case you were wondering, you really shouldn't expect that anything you post on your MySpace page will be kept private. If you are in ...
-
According to an article in USA Today, Facebook is following in the footsteps of Google and others by using targeted ads. I'm not at all ...
-
I was interviewed some time ago for a Globe & Mail article on workplace surveillance, which appeared yesterday. The piece discusses keys...
-
Like many people I suspect, I was concerned to read the recent BBC report about glass ceilings which, the report said, means that "to...
-
Earlier this year, in Hawkes v Cuddy [2009] EWCA Civ 261 , the Court of Appeal declined to follow the position, adopted in Re Guidezone [2...
-
In Gregson v HAE Trustees Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 1006 (Ch) a so-called "dog-leg" claim was brought against the directors of a ...
Comments
Post a comment on: Australia: corporate governance and financial reporting reforms under consideration